Secure your dependencies. Ship with confidence.

This module is highly suspicious and dangerous. It reconstructs an AES key from obfuscated parts, decrypts and decompresses a large embedded payload and executes it with exec(), and contains anti-analysis checks to avoid running under debuggers or VMs. The code is purposefully obfuscated and designed to conceal its actual behavior until runtime. Even though the payload's contents are not visible without decryption, the presence of these patterns indicates probable malicious intent or at minimum a high risk supply-chain backdoor. Do not run this code in any production or trusted environment; treat it as malicious until the decrypted payload is safely inspected in an isolated, instrumented environment.

High risk: the postinstall hook executes local code during installation and the package declaring a dependency with the same name is a supply-chain red flag that could cause installs to pull and execute a registry-controlled package. Inspect the published package contents and index.js before installing, remove or disable the postinstall script if possible, and avoid installing this package until its provenance and intent are verified.

Live on npm for 4 hours and 6 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This script is a high-risk launcher: it unconditionally fetches Python code from a hardcoded remote repo and executes it locally via a shell-invoked Python process while passing unsanitized user inputs directly into the shell command. Even if the upstream repository is currently benign, the pattern enables trivial supply-chain compromise and shell injection. Mitigations: remove runtime download-and-exec; if fetching is necessary, pin and verify cryptographic hashes or signatures, validate content, avoid os.system (use subprocess with argument lists or importlib), sanitize inputs, and add error handling and logging. Treat this module as unsafe in security-sensitive environments until hardened.

The Python module itself is not directly implementing typical malware behaviors, but it creates a high-risk execution surface: it runs local shell scripts (some with sudo) with unvalidated inputs and passes secrets on the command line. The deploy_fdb_from_file_service function contains a command-injection vulnerability (shell=True with joined args) and a coding bug (returncod typo). Recommend: remove shell=True; use argument lists always, avoid passing secrets via argv (use stdin, environment files with proper filesystem permissions, or secured IPC), eliminate unnecessary sudo calls and require callers to provide appropriate privileges if needed, validate/escape inputs (especially file paths), fix the returncod typo, and audit all invoked shell scripts before use. Treat package as risky until mitigations and script audits are performed.

This file is unsafe: it intentionally hides and dynamically executes an embedded payload. It decodes and execs a base64 blob, and that payload decodes further assets, writes a shell script ('server.sh') to disk and executes it via subprocess/system calls. These behaviors match dropper/backdoor patterns and present a high security risk. Treat as malicious until proven otherwise; do not run on production or sensitive systems. Perform full analysis in an isolated sandbox to reveal the final payload actions if required.

The code contains a critical security flaw: untrusted input can be executed via eval(op), enabling arbitrary code execution. The presence of an incomplete assertion at the end adds unreliability and potential crashes. While there is a structured path for known operations, the fallback to eval constitutes a severe vulnerability that undermines supply-chain safety for any package exposing decode_op. Recommend removing eval usage, implementing a safe expression evaluator or whitelist, and adding robust input validation and error handling.

This file implements a server-driven arbitrary code execution channel in the browser: it advertises support via an outgoing 'AnalyticsTracker-Enabled' header, collects concatenated 'AnalyticsTracker-<n>' response headers, base64-decodes their concatenation and immediately eval()s the result. That pattern behaves like a backdoor and is a high security risk — it enables remote/script injection by any server or MITM able to add those headers. Unless you fully trust the responding server and can guarantee integrity of delivered payloads, remove or disable this behavior (replace eval with safe parsing, implement signature verification, restrict origins, or eliminate automatic execution).

This file contains code that reverses a string, decodes it from base64, decompresses it with zlib, and then executes it via exec(). Such obfuscation is a common tactic in malicious scripts to hide their true functionality, which can include data exfiltration, system compromise, or other unauthorized activities. No specific domain or IP address references were found in the decoded payload, but the obfuscation strongly indicates malicious intent.

The code exposes powerful administrative actions: arbitrary shell execution, arbitrary file reads, full environment dumps, and building/pushing Docker images to a hardcoded registry. These are not obfuscated but are high-risk capabilities that can be abused for data exfiltration, remote code execution, and supply-chain leakage if the superuser authentication is compromised or misconfigured. The presence of a hardcoded remote image name for docker push is suspicious for unintended outbound artifact exfiltration. Recommendation: avoid including these endpoints in public packages or ensure strict, auditable authentication and input validation; remove hardcoded push targets and avoid returning full environment variables or arbitrary file contents.

This module implements an unprotected HTTP-triggered command executor: predefined shell commands are executed when matching GET paths are requested. It is hazardous to run on any network-exposed interface without strict controls. Remediation: bind to localhost or specific interface, add authentication/authorization, avoid shell=True by passing args as lists to subprocess without a shell, validate or restrict allowed commands, and add logging and access controls. Treat this code as a potential backdoor; do not run on production or public hosts without significant hardening.

This fragment intends to install and start KasmVNC by running many shell commands that create certs, write VNC password files, adjust group membership, and launch a VNC server. The primary security issues are unsafe shell interpolation (command injection risk), programmatic persistence of a possibly predictable password, execution with sudo based on unvalidated env vars, starting a VNC server exposed on 0.0.0.0 with disabled/basic auth, and multiple unsafe filesystem operations performed via shell. There is no clear evidence of obfuscated or direct exfiltration malware, but the behavior can provide an unauthorized remote access vector (backdoor-like) if used maliciously. Do not run this code without fixing shell usage, validating inputs, using secure randomly generated passwords, enforcing proper file permissions, and not disabling authentication.

The code collects detailed system and package information and sends it to a remote server, which is highly suspicious and indicative of potential data exfiltration. The server hostname (oastify.com) is commonly used for testing data exfiltration, which raises significant security concerns.

Live on npm for 12 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This assembly embeds a hidden sabotage backdoor in SqlCommandExtend.Exec: after a hard-coded timestamp threshold it performs a random check (≈20% probability) on every SQL command and calls Process.GetCurrentProcess()[.]Kill(), abruptly terminating the host application. In addition, most CRUD methods build SQL by inlining values via text.Replace("@param", "'"+ToDbValue(...)+"'"), without using proper SqlParameter bindings, creating a strong risk of SQL injection. This combination of intentional denial-of-service and unsafe query construction constitutes malicious behavior and renders the library untrusted.

While listing files in the directory may not be directly malicious, it can potentially expose sensitive information about the system's file structure. This behavior is considered risky.

Live on npm for 48 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file is an offensive brute-force/credential-stuffing utility that attempts to crack admin login forms, including CAPTCHA bypass via OCR. It auto-installs/updates an external package at import time (supply-chain risk), uses multi-threaded attacks without rate-limiting, writes predictable temporary files, and returns/prints discovered credentials. The code is malicious in purpose and dangerous to run; do not execute it. Review and block usage, and treat the included 'exp10it' dependency as untrusted until its code is audited.

The code exhibits clear signs of malicious behavior by exfiltrating environment variables to an obfuscated and suspicious domain. This poses a significant security risk due to the potential exposure of sensitive information.

Live on npm for 45 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The purpose of this code appears to be collecting specific environment variables and package information, compressing and encoding it, and sending it over HTTP to a remote domain. The intent and purpose of this behavior are unclear from the provided code fragment alone.

Live on npm for 32 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The SweetAlert2 library code is mostly benign and serves as a UI modal dialog tool. However, it contains a suspicious and potentially malicious snippet that targets Russian users on certain domains to play an unsolicited audio prank, disabling pointer events and potentially disrupting user interaction. This behavior is unexpected and should be considered a moderate security risk and potential malware. The rest of the code shows no signs of malicious intent. The provided reports were invalid and unhelpful. Users should be cautious about this version of the library due to the embedded prank behavior.

This module is not evidently malware, but it contains serious security issues: passwords are sent via GET, the HMAC key can default to empty, and user input is directly interpolated into SQL causing SQL injection risk and account enumeration. Treat this as high-risk insecure code that must be remediated before deployment.

The provided code imports and executes functions from various modules with unusual names, which is slightly suspicious. However, there are no explicit malicious activities, such as data theft or system damage, visible in this fragment alone. Further inspection of the imported modules is recommended to ensure they do not perform any harmful operations.

Live on npm for 57 days and 15 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains unusual naming conventions and the use of an uncommon method 'functame' across multiple modules which may indicate obfuscation or non-standard practices. However, without more information on what the 'functame' method does in each of these modules, it's challenging to definitively determine if the code is malicious. The anomalies suggest a need for further inspection of the individual modules being imported.

Live on npm for 56 days, 23 hours and 11 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file is malicious. It actively harvests private keys and sensitive tokens from the local environment and exfiltrates them to a hardcoded external server. It also performs dynamic execution of a base64-decoded payload via eval. Even though the immediate decoded payload is a harmless console.log, the combination of credential theft, silent errors, remote exfiltration, and eval indicates intentional and dangerous behavior consistent with a supply-chain backdoor. The package should be considered compromised and removed from use; any systems that executed it should be treated as potentially breached and secrets rotated.

This module is highly suspicious and dangerous. It reconstructs an AES key from obfuscated parts, decrypts and decompresses a large embedded payload and executes it with exec(), and contains anti-analysis checks to avoid running under debuggers or VMs. The code is purposefully obfuscated and designed to conceal its actual behavior until runtime. Even though the payload's contents are not visible without decryption, the presence of these patterns indicates probable malicious intent or at minimum a high risk supply-chain backdoor. Do not run this code in any production or trusted environment; treat it as malicious until the decrypted payload is safely inspected in an isolated, instrumented environment.

High risk: the postinstall hook executes local code during installation and the package declaring a dependency with the same name is a supply-chain red flag that could cause installs to pull and execute a registry-controlled package. Inspect the published package contents and index.js before installing, remove or disable the postinstall script if possible, and avoid installing this package until its provenance and intent are verified.

Live on npm for 4 hours and 6 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This script is a high-risk launcher: it unconditionally fetches Python code from a hardcoded remote repo and executes it locally via a shell-invoked Python process while passing unsanitized user inputs directly into the shell command. Even if the upstream repository is currently benign, the pattern enables trivial supply-chain compromise and shell injection. Mitigations: remove runtime download-and-exec; if fetching is necessary, pin and verify cryptographic hashes or signatures, validate content, avoid os.system (use subprocess with argument lists or importlib), sanitize inputs, and add error handling and logging. Treat this module as unsafe in security-sensitive environments until hardened.

The Python module itself is not directly implementing typical malware behaviors, but it creates a high-risk execution surface: it runs local shell scripts (some with sudo) with unvalidated inputs and passes secrets on the command line. The deploy_fdb_from_file_service function contains a command-injection vulnerability (shell=True with joined args) and a coding bug (returncod typo). Recommend: remove shell=True; use argument lists always, avoid passing secrets via argv (use stdin, environment files with proper filesystem permissions, or secured IPC), eliminate unnecessary sudo calls and require callers to provide appropriate privileges if needed, validate/escape inputs (especially file paths), fix the returncod typo, and audit all invoked shell scripts before use. Treat package as risky until mitigations and script audits are performed.

This file is unsafe: it intentionally hides and dynamically executes an embedded payload. It decodes and execs a base64 blob, and that payload decodes further assets, writes a shell script ('server.sh') to disk and executes it via subprocess/system calls. These behaviors match dropper/backdoor patterns and present a high security risk. Treat as malicious until proven otherwise; do not run on production or sensitive systems. Perform full analysis in an isolated sandbox to reveal the final payload actions if required.

The code contains a critical security flaw: untrusted input can be executed via eval(op), enabling arbitrary code execution. The presence of an incomplete assertion at the end adds unreliability and potential crashes. While there is a structured path for known operations, the fallback to eval constitutes a severe vulnerability that undermines supply-chain safety for any package exposing decode_op. Recommend removing eval usage, implementing a safe expression evaluator or whitelist, and adding robust input validation and error handling.

This file implements a server-driven arbitrary code execution channel in the browser: it advertises support via an outgoing 'AnalyticsTracker-Enabled' header, collects concatenated 'AnalyticsTracker-<n>' response headers, base64-decodes their concatenation and immediately eval()s the result. That pattern behaves like a backdoor and is a high security risk — it enables remote/script injection by any server or MITM able to add those headers. Unless you fully trust the responding server and can guarantee integrity of delivered payloads, remove or disable this behavior (replace eval with safe parsing, implement signature verification, restrict origins, or eliminate automatic execution).

This file contains code that reverses a string, decodes it from base64, decompresses it with zlib, and then executes it via exec(). Such obfuscation is a common tactic in malicious scripts to hide their true functionality, which can include data exfiltration, system compromise, or other unauthorized activities. No specific domain or IP address references were found in the decoded payload, but the obfuscation strongly indicates malicious intent.

The code exposes powerful administrative actions: arbitrary shell execution, arbitrary file reads, full environment dumps, and building/pushing Docker images to a hardcoded registry. These are not obfuscated but are high-risk capabilities that can be abused for data exfiltration, remote code execution, and supply-chain leakage if the superuser authentication is compromised or misconfigured. The presence of a hardcoded remote image name for docker push is suspicious for unintended outbound artifact exfiltration. Recommendation: avoid including these endpoints in public packages or ensure strict, auditable authentication and input validation; remove hardcoded push targets and avoid returning full environment variables or arbitrary file contents.

This module implements an unprotected HTTP-triggered command executor: predefined shell commands are executed when matching GET paths are requested. It is hazardous to run on any network-exposed interface without strict controls. Remediation: bind to localhost or specific interface, add authentication/authorization, avoid shell=True by passing args as lists to subprocess without a shell, validate or restrict allowed commands, and add logging and access controls. Treat this code as a potential backdoor; do not run on production or public hosts without significant hardening.

This fragment intends to install and start KasmVNC by running many shell commands that create certs, write VNC password files, adjust group membership, and launch a VNC server. The primary security issues are unsafe shell interpolation (command injection risk), programmatic persistence of a possibly predictable password, execution with sudo based on unvalidated env vars, starting a VNC server exposed on 0.0.0.0 with disabled/basic auth, and multiple unsafe filesystem operations performed via shell. There is no clear evidence of obfuscated or direct exfiltration malware, but the behavior can provide an unauthorized remote access vector (backdoor-like) if used maliciously. Do not run this code without fixing shell usage, validating inputs, using secure randomly generated passwords, enforcing proper file permissions, and not disabling authentication.

The code collects detailed system and package information and sends it to a remote server, which is highly suspicious and indicative of potential data exfiltration. The server hostname (oastify.com) is commonly used for testing data exfiltration, which raises significant security concerns.

Live on npm for 12 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This assembly embeds a hidden sabotage backdoor in SqlCommandExtend.Exec: after a hard-coded timestamp threshold it performs a random check (≈20% probability) on every SQL command and calls Process.GetCurrentProcess()[.]Kill(), abruptly terminating the host application. In addition, most CRUD methods build SQL by inlining values via text.Replace("@param", "'"+ToDbValue(...)+"'"), without using proper SqlParameter bindings, creating a strong risk of SQL injection. This combination of intentional denial-of-service and unsafe query construction constitutes malicious behavior and renders the library untrusted.

While listing files in the directory may not be directly malicious, it can potentially expose sensitive information about the system's file structure. This behavior is considered risky.

Live on npm for 48 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file is an offensive brute-force/credential-stuffing utility that attempts to crack admin login forms, including CAPTCHA bypass via OCR. It auto-installs/updates an external package at import time (supply-chain risk), uses multi-threaded attacks without rate-limiting, writes predictable temporary files, and returns/prints discovered credentials. The code is malicious in purpose and dangerous to run; do not execute it. Review and block usage, and treat the included 'exp10it' dependency as untrusted until its code is audited.

The code exhibits clear signs of malicious behavior by exfiltrating environment variables to an obfuscated and suspicious domain. This poses a significant security risk due to the potential exposure of sensitive information.

Live on npm for 45 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The purpose of this code appears to be collecting specific environment variables and package information, compressing and encoding it, and sending it over HTTP to a remote domain. The intent and purpose of this behavior are unclear from the provided code fragment alone.

Live on npm for 32 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The SweetAlert2 library code is mostly benign and serves as a UI modal dialog tool. However, it contains a suspicious and potentially malicious snippet that targets Russian users on certain domains to play an unsolicited audio prank, disabling pointer events and potentially disrupting user interaction. This behavior is unexpected and should be considered a moderate security risk and potential malware. The rest of the code shows no signs of malicious intent. The provided reports were invalid and unhelpful. Users should be cautious about this version of the library due to the embedded prank behavior.

This module is not evidently malware, but it contains serious security issues: passwords are sent via GET, the HMAC key can default to empty, and user input is directly interpolated into SQL causing SQL injection risk and account enumeration. Treat this as high-risk insecure code that must be remediated before deployment.

The provided code imports and executes functions from various modules with unusual names, which is slightly suspicious. However, there are no explicit malicious activities, such as data theft or system damage, visible in this fragment alone. Further inspection of the imported modules is recommended to ensure they do not perform any harmful operations.

Live on npm for 57 days and 15 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains unusual naming conventions and the use of an uncommon method 'functame' across multiple modules which may indicate obfuscation or non-standard practices. However, without more information on what the 'functame' method does in each of these modules, it's challenging to definitively determine if the code is malicious. The anomalies suggest a need for further inspection of the individual modules being imported.

Live on npm for 56 days, 23 hours and 11 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file is malicious. It actively harvests private keys and sensitive tokens from the local environment and exfiltrates them to a hardcoded external server. It also performs dynamic execution of a base64-decoded payload via eval. Even though the immediate decoded payload is a harmless console.log, the combination of credential theft, silent errors, remote exfiltration, and eval indicates intentional and dangerous behavior consistent with a supply-chain backdoor. The package should be considered compromised and removed from use; any systems that executed it should be treated as potentially breached and secrets rotated.